|Print this story||Permalink|
By Jennifer Warren
Burton Pugach, a disbarred Forest Hills attorney best known for blinding the mistress who eventually became his wife by commissioning two men to throw lye in her face in 1959, has filed suit against Queens District Attorney Richard Brown.
Last month Pugach, who has been working as a paralegal since serving a 14-year jail sentence for the attack on Linda Reiss, said he filed a complaint against Brown to halt the DAs investigation into his personal finances and to seek his reinstatement to the bar.
DA spokeswoman Mary de Bourbon said Brown would not comment on a pending lawsuit.
Pugach, 74, said the investigation involved inquiries into his bank account and letters to former clients, actions which he contended were damaging to his paralegal business.
But City Corporation Counsel Michael Hess, the attorney for Brown, argued that by granting a stay on the investigation the court would interfere with an ongoing state criminal proceeding.
Hess also said the court lacked jurisdiction over the disbarment complaint and that under the 11th Amendment, Brown is immune from lawsuits when he is acting in an official capacity.
The DAs investigation into Pugach began when an out-of-state woman sent a letter of complaint to the district attorney claiming Pugach had taken $5,000 from her, a legal source said. Only subsequently did the woman learn Pugach had been barred from practicing law, the source said.
While charges have not been filed against Pugach, he responded to the investigation with his own lawsuit for numerous reasons, he said.
No. 1, to try and undo a grave injustice that was done to me in taking away my license the way they did, he said in a telephone interview.
Pugach contended the prosecutor inspected his electronic Citibank records without a subpoena or probable cause, and his lawsuit was as much for the general public as for himself.
It was filed on behalf of every citizen, he said. What district attorney has the right to go into someones financial records? God help our society if it allows anyone to go into your finances without probable cause, without a subpoena, without anything, Pugach said.
In a complaint filed on March 6 with the federal court in the Eastern Districtt, Pugach, who is serving as his own counsel, maintains that in 1960 he was indicted for a misdemeanor, not a felony, which does not warrant revoking a license.
Pugach also maintains his arrest resulted from illegal wiretap evidence and that the attorney originally assigned to him Herbert Seigal was in fact suing him at the time.
Evoking his 1996 arrest and acquittal for harassing Evangeline Borja, Pugach maintains that the woman was coerced and the charges were fabricated by the Brown and his staff.
When somebody comes out of jail theyre expected to get a shopping cart and pick up soda bottles, Pugach said. I came out and I became very successful. I did well in investing, in paralegal, and theres a measure of resentment and personal envy.
In 1959 Pugach hired two men to assault his mistress Linda Reiss. He was convicted of maiming Reiss, and served a 14-year prison sentence for the crime. The couple made headlines when upon Pugachs release, a blinded Reiss married him.
Reach reporter Jennifer Warren by e-mail at Timesledgr@aol.com or call 229-0300, Ext. 155.
©2001 Community Newspaper Group
|Print this story||Permalink|
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.