Bosco’s Corner: U.S. Open seems like snoozefest

Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Hey, did you know the US Open is starting next week?

That’s right, one of the world’s most prestigious tennis tournaments, one of the four Grand Slam events and — I would wager — the biggest sporting event held annually in New York City, is set to kick off Monday with first-round play.

You know what else? I don’t think anyone gives a furry rat’s behind.

Tennis, a sport which has steadily declining in popularity over the past several years, is seemingly at its lowest point in years. That the US Open is receiving such frighteningly little buzz is only adding to the woes of a sport that no longer captures the attention of the American public.

To compound matters further, the most dominant player in the sport on either the men’s or women’s side, Serena Williams, the defending US Open champ, has pulled out of the tournament this year because of a nagging knee injury that required surgery.

In most sports when a player as dominant as Serena Williams pulls out of a tournament, the field would be considered wide open. But in tennis, particularly women’s tennis, the field always seems top heavy, with only a handful of players capable of running the table to win the tournament.

With Serena Williams out, her sister Venus’ chances of winning another Grand Slam tournament are greatly improved, having lost to Serena in the finals of both Wimbeldon and the US Open last year. But Venus also has her own physical ailment to deal with, a recurring abdominal injury.

There are a few other female participants not to be discounted, including Justine Henin-Hardenn, Kim Clijsters, Jennifer Capriati, Lindsay Davenport, Amelie Mauresmo and Chanda Rubin. The odds are one of those mentioned above will walk away from Flushing Meadows with the 2003 title. It’s not a lock, but unknowns seldom win on the pro tour, especially in the women’s bracket.

That Serena Williams, the most prominent name in the sport, is unable to defend her crown is certainly a blow to the tournament, both for ratings and general interest. However, play may turn out to be more competitive and a new champ will undoubtedly be crowned.

But I can’t escape the thought that it just seems more people are interested in running over to Arthur Ashe Kids’ Day Saturday to catch a glimpse of the so-called “Lolita of women’s tennis,” Anna Kournikova, who still hasn’t won a singles tournament, but probably makes more money that anyone else on the tour in endorsements alone.

And who says looks don’t matter?

As for the men’s draw, well, there could not be less enthusiasm in it if the United States Tennis Association tried intentionally to make the sport the most boring on the planet. I know that’s not fair, but there is no juice at all in the men’s draw, no excitement and hardly a household name in the lot.

Incredibly, the official US Open Web site has Andre Agassi listed as the front-runner to win the trophy. Agassi already had two US Open crowns to his credit and three other appearances in the championship match, losing all three — including last year’s — to longtime rival Pete Sampras.

Sampras, the all-time leader in Grand Slam victories on the men’s tour, made a spectacular comeback a year ago to stun the tennis world by finding the skill that had seemingly abandoned him in recent years to reclaim his place among the world’s elite. But Sampras, like Serena Williams, is not competing this year, knocking out at least the possibility of rooting for the sentimental favorite.

Agassi’s up and down career has provided millions with thrills over the years, but I just don’t see the Las Vegas native making a run and riveting the public again. Not that he is incapable of some great tennis, but even if he wins the things, I just don’t see a lot of people caring too much.

You may have heard of some of the players the experts are expecting to make a push toward the championship, but I don’t know if any can truly inspire the imagination of a dwindling tennis fan base, not to mention the casual fan.

Lleyton Hewitt, Andy Roddick, Roger Federer, Juan Carlos Ferrero, Sjeng Schalke, Marat Safin, Fernando Gonzalez and Mark Philippoussis highlight the rest of the field.

Hewitt, who won Wimbeldon in 2001 but was shut out at all three previous Grand Slam events this year, is a good bet to be there at the end, while Roddick, an American with a blistering serve, has yet to win his first Grand Slam but seems long overdue.

Unlike the women’s field, the men’s draw always seems to produce a dark horse or two. My pick as the sentimental favorite has to be Michael Chang, the former No. 2 player in the world who won his first Grand Slam at the age of 17, besting Ivan Lendl in the French Open. Chang, who made the cut as a wild card entry, has said he is retiring after the US Open.

But no matter how good the story line or how compelling the drama, without the crossover interest from the hardcore tennis fan to the average Joe on the street, this year’s US Open seems like a snooze fest, unless of course Kournikova can keep from getting eliminated in the first round again.

Reach Sports Editor Anthony Bosco by e-mail at or call 718-229-0300, Ext. 130.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

CNG: Community Newspaper Group