Who would have guessed it? It seems that public hearings are being scheduled to determine how the Kings County Democratic Party will be selecting its judiciary in the near future. A current panel, led by St. Francis College President Frank Macchiarola, will reportedly hold a public session looking for input in the next few weeks, possibly early next month, political insiders said. The six-person panel has already met a handful of times, said Assemblymember Vito Lopez, the current chair of the Kings County Democratic Party. The public hearing, which had not been scheduled as this paper went to press, is a big step in making the decision more public a demand of reformers for quite some time. Its quite a bold move to open up the panel, said Lopez, who added that he has not really gotten involved in their meetings. Theyre the ones having a dialogue, Im just looking forward to hearing from them, he said. Lopez said that, following the public hearings, the panel will come up with a recommendation that would be forwarded to the chair. Lopez would then bring the recommendations to the executive board for a vote. We were hoping that it was going to be in early January, but now were hoping for early February, he said. Calls to Dr. Macchiarolas office at St. Francis College were not returned as this paper went to press. Other members of the judicial screening panel include Assemblymember Joe Lentol, Manuel Romero, past president of the Brooklyn Bar Association, attorney Gerold Lefcourt, counsel advisor Carl Landrissino, Pamela Straker of Brooklyn Psychiatric Services and Howard Glickstein, president of Touro College. Known far and wide as a great negotiator, Macchiarola took on the judicial screening committee after helping to hammer out an agreement between Radio City Entertainment and Local 802 of the American Federation of Musicians, who refused to play in the historic Christmas Spectacular until they received better wages and employment benefits. Claiming that judgeships had been bought, sold and traded in the borough, reformers have long demanded that the current judicial screening process, which was led by then Kings County Party Boss Clarence Norman, should be torn down and rebuilt. Even Mayor Michael Bloomberg joined the fight, claiming in a Daily News op-ed piece that current judicial screenings is a farce, which, he claimed, bears more of a resemblance to voting in the Soviet Union than in the United States of America. If we dont change how we select our judges, and at the same time insist that judges decide cases promptly and fairly, we face frightening consequences, Bloomberg wrote. Most judges in this city are dedicated, competent jurists. But some are unquestionably not qualified and others made it onto the bench because of shady back-room deals. Some judges have been selected because they paid off a local political leader or agreed to hire a particular law clerk. Once on the bench, some issue corrupt decisions based on whom they know or who bought them a box of cigars. [Holding public hearings are a great idea, said Alan Fleishman, the Democratic district leader to the 52nd Assembly District in Park Slope. Anything that adds transparency to the process and gives the public a window into whats happening is a good thing.
©2006 Community News Group
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.