|Print this story||Permalink|
Tenants at Brooklyns massive Starrett City housing complex are nervous, and perhaps with good reason. Their homes are up for sale, and no one can say for sure what impact this may have on their future. Many worry that rents could soar under a new landlord, burdening thousands of working-class New Yorkers a fear dismissed by the propertys existing owners. Nonetheless, tenants groups say they are preparing for a fight, and they have secured more than a few influential allies. Built in 1974, Starrett City is the countrys largest government subsidized apartment complex. The 46-tower development near East New York includes almost 5,900 apartments and is home to about 12,000 low- and middle-income residents. While renamed Spring Creek Towers in 2002, the community remains commonly known by its original moniker. The sprawling, 140-acre site has grown to include a shopping center, schools, parks and churches. Brick housing towers some boasting views of Jamaica Bay are surrounded by rolling green lawns. The community is economically and racially diverse, and it is widely accepted as a New York success story. Most residents are pleased to call Starrett City home. They say its safe, attractive and affordable, and thats how they want it to stay. Experts speculate Starrett City could soon sell for more than $1 billion, making it one of the biggest real estate deals in New York history. But it is what may happen after the sale that has locals on edge. Starrett City was built under the states Mitchell-Lama program by a limited-profit housing corporation that received lucrative government subsidies. Tenants and many politicians fear a new owner could opt out of the Mitchell-Lama program, and switch to a money-hungry for-profit company. If the rent goes up, Im in trouble, said Marie Purnell, president of the Starrett Tenants Association and resident for three decades. Purnell, 76, said she is also concerned new owners could roll back services like security and building maintenance. The bottom line in all of this is money, Purnell said. Our survey of residents along busy Pennsylvania Avenue revealed widespread community concern and confusion. If rents go up, well be forced to move, said Mlak Jolanta, 56, who has resided at Starrett City since 1985. Its not fair. Larry Nottingham, 72, worries his $700 per month rent may increase. I just hope nothing changes, and everyone gets together and does the right thing. A lot of people are concerned, said mother-of-three Marisol Padilla, 39. More than 1,000 tenants voiced those concerns at a rally on Saturday, backed by an impressive lineup of political heavyweights. Assembling inside the Christian Cultural Center on Flatlands Avenue, energized tenants chanted, Our community is not for sale! Borough President Marty Markowitz, Council Speaker Christine Quinn and Councilmember Charles Barron called on city and state officials to block any prospective owner who intends to convert the Starrett City into market-rate apartments. Governor Eliot Spitzer has also pledged his support, citing serious concerns over the future of this large stock of affordable housing. Spitzer brings considerable political leverage. The state holds Starretts $234 million interest-free mortgage, and could therefore potentially block a new owner. The Governor has signaled his willingness to work with bidders who share our belief in long-term affordability, said Spitzer spokesperson Christine Anderson. Another weapon political allies may invoke is that any development of the vacant land at Starrett City would require city and state approval. The ownership group, Starrett City Associates, is chaired by financier Disque Dean. New York real estate mogul Donald Trump is one of several investors. Martin McLaughlin, a spokesperson for Starrett City Associates, maintains community fears are unwarranted. We believe that this development will remain as an affordable subsidized complex, with over 90 percent of residents qualified for rent subsidies, McLaughlin said, stressing that subsidized rents would remain proportional to residents incomes. McLaughlin declined Monday afternoon to reveal how many bids were submitted, and said because of government approval processes, it could be months before a sale is finalized. This is not another Stuyvesant Town, McLaughlin added, distancing Starrett City from the controversial sale of lower Manhattans middle-class housing oasis. Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village recently fetched more than $5 billion, and some tenants at those complexes already face steep rent increases. While Manhattans real estate market appears to be squeezing out everyone but the wealthy, some say that trend is repeating itself in parts of Brooklyn. Bertha Lewis, Executive Director of New York ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), believes Starrett City could be consumed by creeping gentrification that could price out poorer residents. Its prime property, and location is everything, Lewis said. The wave is already flowing, she said, referring to burgeoning real estate prices in nearby East New York. Lewis encouraged all levels of government to use carrots and sticks to protect tenants, and suggested an affordable housing guarantee be written into the sales agreement. There is just no protection for these tenants whatsoever, Lewis said. Its frightening.
©2007 Community Newspaper Group
|Print this story||Permalink|
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.