Sections

A third MTA worker may have seen ’05 rape

Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

The attorney for a Brooklyn woman who was raped four years ago on a Long Island City subway platform said they received a letter from an MTA dispatcher, which suggests that a third employee from the agency may have been present during the attack, but did not respond.

Maria Besedin, 25, was sexually assaulted in June 2005 around 2 a.m. by a man on the subway platform of the G line at Long Island City’s 21st Street station. She had run toward a toll booth clerk at the station and pleaded for help, but the clerk merely looked on as the assailant dragged her back down the stairs to the subway platform and raped her multiple times, Albert said.

The MTA has defended the clerk’s decision to call the police rather than intervene, arguing that the agency’s employees should not be expected to perform in the capacity of law enforcement officers.

Besedin had filed a suit against the MTA, the toll clerk and a conductor, who had driven a train through the Long Island City station as the rape was occurring but did not stop, Albert said. A Queens judge threw out the case earlier this month on the grounds that the MTA employees followed the agency’s rule book, but Besedin’s attorneys plan to file an appeal.

Albert said the MTA recently handed over a letter written by an MTA dispatcher which asked the agency to investigate a train supervisor who had responded to the station at the time of the incident.

The supervisor had reported that he arrived at the scene after police, but the dispatcher wrote in her letter that her colleague’s demeanor and tone of voice led her to believe that he was the first to respond, but waited quietly until police arrived rather than step in, Albert said.

“This is an initiative we’ll raise in an appeal,” Albert said. “The MTA did not give this information to us out of the goodness of their hearts. They felt pretty strongly that if they didn’t exchange it, [the dispatcher] would come forward. It could change the position of the court.”

The MTA could not be reached for comment.

Reach reporter Nathan Duke by e−mail at nduke@cnglocal.com or by phone at 718−229−0300, Ext. 156.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

This week’s featured advertisers

CNG: Community Newspaper Group