Willets bid process called into question

Crowds walk between Citi Field and Willets West, a shopping and entertainment complex proposed by Sterling Equities and Related Cos., in a rendering of what the project would look like. Rendering courtesy Michael Bloomberg
TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

The winners of a bid to redevelop Willets Point may have had a leg up on the competition, although the city said the selection process was completely unbiased.

The partnership of Sterling Equities and Related Cos. submitted the winning design to transform the Iron Triangle, which is currently without a sewer system and basic city services, into a hub of retail and housing encompassing Citi Field in Flushing Meadows Corona Park.

The mayor unveiled the plans at a June 14 breakfast and touted the proposal as “exactly as envisioned and approved by the community and City Council back in 2008.”

But there was one component of the plan that no one had seen before, not even the other developers who bid on the roughly $3 billion project.

When the city released its request for proposals in May 2011, it was seeking developers to build in a precisely defined area along 126th Street across from Citi Field.

The Sterling and Related plan calls for development within the boundaries defined in the RFP, but it also features another 1 million-square-foot retail and entertainment block to the west of the stadium.

Called Willets West, it will be built in the New York Mets parking lot on land not mentioned as available for development in the RFP.

People knowledgeable of the bidding process who did not want to be identified said no one other than Sterling Equities and Related Cos. knew development to the west of the stadium was a possibility.

Sterling Equities is owned by the Wilpon family, which also owns the Mets.

The land where Willets West is proposed is currently leased to the Mets and thus the Wilpon family.

The city Economic Development Corp. said in a statement that any of the developers competing to win the contract could propose whatever they wanted, meaning any extra projects were never off the table but simply would not be funded as part of the redevelopment project.

“As with any RFP, respondents can propose what they believe to be the best project within their ability and are free to form partnerships to achieve that end,” an EDC spokeswoman said. “The chosen proposal fulfills the original vision for Willets Point and more. We look forward to working with the team on this historic project.”

Amid questions on whether or not development on the parking lot is even legal — it technically sits on strictly regulated parkland — the city has contended that a 1961 state law allows development in the footprint of Citi Field and all of the surrounding parking lots.

“This project is allowed under the same 1961 state legislation that authorized the construction of Shea Stadium and also permits a broad range of other uses beyond stadiums,” said Elizabeth Thomas, of the city Law Department. “The planned entertainment and retail destination will enhance the attraction of Citi Field and the entire Flushing Meadows area.”

The legislation does indeed stipulate that the parking lots and stadium land can be used for a wide variety of retail, recreation, entertainment, amusement or educational uses.

Any use has to benefit the Mets, though.

A clause in the law requires any development to aid in the financing of the team’s stadium, or any development associated with that stadium.

Reach reporter Joe Anuta by or by phone at 718-260-4566.

Updated 11:37 pm, April 17, 2013
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Michael Rikon from Willets Point says:
It is one thing to use park land for a baseball stadium and related parking, and another to use City park land for a mega retail enterprise. Any use of park land rquires, not only approval of the City Council, but authorization by the State Legislature. This proposed theft of Park Land is absolutely against the law.
July 3, 2012, 8:45 am
Carmine says:
Whenever I see a story about land development in Flushing I keep flashing back to that poor man whose house was taken away from him via a phony mortgage, and as he tried to fight through the legal system to get his house back - he ended up dead under very suspicious circumstances.

With rich foreigners now being able to buy greencards for themselves and their families, I guess the developers are licking their chops with the expectation that Flushing will be a boomtown with an influx of wealthy Chinese taking advantage of the new law
July 7, 2012, 7 pm
John says:
Alfredo, what the hell are you saying???
July 9, 2012, 9:59 am
Carmine says:
I am not Alfredo from malba gardens, he is a good man and he cares about his town, not like you, you nut!!
July 10, 2012, 11:42 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

CNG: Community Newspaper Group