Bloomberg’s soda ban falls flat in latest ruling from the courts

Various cup sizes and sugar cubes are displayed at a news conference at City Hall as the mayor announces his proposed ban of large sugary drinks. AP Photo/Richard Drew
TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Despite its second loss in court, the Bloomberg administration vowed Tuesday to continue its fight to limit sugary drinks to 16 ounces or less.

“We firmly disagree with the court’s reasoning and will seek to appeal to the [state] Court of Appeals as quickly as possible,” Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo said in a statement. “There is broad precedent for the Board of Health to adopt significant measures to protect New Yorkers’ public health.”

The Appellate Division, First Department issued an unanimous ruling Tuesday stating Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the city Health Department violated the “principle of separation of powers” when creating the ban.

This week’s decision follows a March ruling from Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling, who said Bloomberg and the city Board of Health overstepped their jurisdictions when proposing the ban.

The Appellate Division’s ruling upheld Tingling’s decision.

“Like the Supreme Court, we conclude that in promulgating this regulation the Board of Health failed to act within the bounds of its lawfully delegated authority,” wrote Justice Dianne Renwick.

Following the ruling, the mayor reiterated his belief that sugary drinks remain the key factor in an obesity epidemic that kills 5,000 New Yorkers each year.

“Since New York City’s groundbreaking limit on the portion size of sugary beverages was prevented from going into effect on March 12, more than 2,000 New Yorkers have died from the effects of diabetes,” Bloomberg said in a statement. “Today’s decision is a temporary setback, and we plan to appeal this decision as we continue the fight against the obesity epidemic.”

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Benny Wong from Fresh Meadows says:
Why is he wasting our including my tax dollars on his quest for a useless ban that can be easily circumvented? Use city taxpayer's dollars for something more useful than just getting his name in the city's law books of such useless accomplishment.
Aug. 5, 2013, 3:01 pm
marie from woodhaven says:
Mr. Bloomberg I hate you. You are a piece of shyt. You can vigurously fight for a dumb cause, but you cant fight to better the board of ed school system, you cant fight to clean up NYC trash epidemic, you cant fight for low income housing for the homeless, you cant fight crime, you cant fight for the hungry people you cant fight for any good cause. Yet, you can write checks to billionares to buy property in Bklyn for a damn arena? You care nothing for the people of NY. Your income has trippled while people go hungry, people are homeless and the bd of ed is almost non exsistant. You are totally useless and you are a racist pig. I cannot wait for you to leave office. Leave and disappear, you useless piece of shyt!!!!!!!!!!
Aug. 10, 2013, 2:32 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

CNG: Community Newspaper Group