Sections

Astoria lawmakers concerned over Indian Point nuclear reactor shutdown

Elected officials in Astoria worry that the early shutdown of the Indian Point nuclear reactors may force increased production from power plants in western Queens.
TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

While environmentalists across the region hailed Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s announcement Monday that the Indian Point Energy Center would close by 2021, two Astoria lawmakers have their concerns.

The aging 2,000-megawatt nuclear power plant, located just 25 miles north of New York City, produces nearly 20 percent of the city’s electrical power while presenting numerous threats to the safety of over 20 million residents and the environmental health of the area.

“In light of news regarding the closure of Indian Point over the next few years, we must ensure that any replacement power does not further burden already suffering communities,” state Sen. Michael Gianaris (D-Astoria) said. “Western Queens already produces a majority of the electricity for the New York metropolitan area and has the high asthma and emphysema rates to prove it. Make no mistake, I will vigorously fight any efforts to build new power plants in already oversaturated communities.”

The governor’s office said transmission upgrades and efficiency measures totaling over 700 megawatts are already in service and that several generation sources are also fully permitted and readily available to come online by 2021, after the plant’s closure. That, combined with clean and renewable hydropower, will be able to generate more than enough electrical power to replace Indian Point’s capacity by 2021, his office said.

City Councilman Costa Constantinides (D-Astoria), the chairman of the City Council’s Environmental Protection Committee, is pleased with the closure but worries about Astoria and Long Island City, already known as Asthma Alley, home to more than half of the city’s power plants.

“As over 50 percent of our city’s power is generated in western Queens, this closure must not increase the burden on existing fuel-fired power plants in our city,” Constantinides said. “Rather, it should encourage New York to continue to develop clean energy sources. As we phase out the generation of nuclear power in our region, we must also phase out the use of Nos. 4 and 6 fuel oils in power plants throughout our state. These types of dirty fuel oils produce carbon emissions that negatively impact our public health. Now more than ever, New York is leading the way on environmental policy and sustainabi­lity.”

Officials at Entergy, the company that operates the Indian Point Energy Center, said the decision to shut the facility 14 years early is part of a settlement in which New York state agreed to drop legal challenges related to renewal of operating licenses.

“Key considerations in our decision to shut down Indian Point ahead of schedule include sustained low current and projected wholesale energy prices that have reduced revenues as well as increased operating costs,” Entergy President Bill Mohl said. “In addition, we foresee continuing costs for license renewal beyond the more than $200 million and 10 years we’ve already invested.”

Reach reporter Bill Parry by e-mail at bparry@cnglocal.com or by phone at (718) 260–4538.

Posted 12:00 am, January 13, 2017
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Jim Hopf says:
No real "environmentalist" would ever cheer the closure of a nuclear power plant, i.e., a facility that produces mass quantities of non-polluting, non-CO2-eimtting electricity around the clock (and regardless of weather conditions).

This will result in higher power costs, more air pollution, and higher CO2 emissions.

How about referring to them as nuclear opponents, as opposed to "environmentalists?
Jan. 13, 2:47 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

Community News Group