Dan Hendrick, the communications director for the New York League of Conservation Voters, said congestion pricing is needed because "the city is going to grow.But Corey Bearak, a policy adviser for the interest group Keep NYC Congestion Tax Free, contended that congestion pricing was a "tax" that had more to do with paying for mass transit improvements than relieving Manhattan traffic. He said there are better ways to come up with funding for buses and subways. "It's very clear it's all about revenue for mass transit," said Bearak, who is also the president of the Queens Civic Congress, a role he insists he keeps separate from his consulting work for the anti-congestion pricing interest group.Hendrick said congestion costs the city between $12 billion and $15 billion a year from fuel costs and loss of productivity. "The subways are so crowded now. There's just no way it's going to work," Hendrick said.Of the 40 percent of Queens residents who work in Manhattan, 18 percent drive into the city, he said.Funds from congestion pricing would go toward improving mass transit, an idea that Hendrick advocated."There's been a systemic under-funding of our transit system for some time," he said. With congestion pricing, Hendrick said, "you hit two birds with one stone. You reduce traffic and it's a fine way to fund your transit system."One attendee at the forum said he was concerned that cars would park on borough streets and enter Manhattan through mass transit to avoid congestion pricing."I just don't see how (congestion pricing) is going to benefit Queens at all," the man said.Bearak touched on that point, arguing that outerborough residents would be disproportionately affected by tolls on the East River bridges."The bulk of these people from Brooklyn and Queens are paying the bulk of the tolls," he said, noting that the Port Authority crossings would have an $8 charge while the Midtown Tunnel, which is more often used by Long Island commuters, would have a $4 charge. "It's ridiculous and absurd."Bearak said congestion could be "significantly" reduced just by banning taxis from cruising on Manhattan streets and mandating them to pick up passengers at taxi stands.Reach reporter Howard Koplowitz by e-mail at hkoplowitz
©2008 Community News Group
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.