Don’t abuse eminent domain use

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

For about 200 years since the founding of this Republic, everybody — Republicans, Democrats, independents, rich, middle class and poor — were in agreement that government could exercise eminent domain and take private property for just compensation for a public purpose, to wit: a school, a road, transportation facilities, a public building.

All were in agreement there could be no taking for a private commercial business enterprise. The time-honored concept that eminent domain should not be used for a private real estate development came to an end several years ago, when the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, ruled a municipality could take private property and turn it over to a private real estate developer.

Parenthetically, that development never came to pass, the property remains empty to date and the municipality passed a resolution apologizing to the homeowners it threw off their properties.

The Kelo case caused a furor throughout this country, with the result being that 44 states enacted legislation prohibiting such a taking. Not surprisingly, New York state was not one of those states, given the fact that too many politicians are bedded with real estate interests.

For example, several years ago Daniel Doctoroff, then a high official in the Bloomberg administration, bragged before a group of real estate moguls that under its administration more than 90 percent of variances sought were granted.

The U.S. House of Representatives recently enacted a bill, H.R. 1433, called The Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2012, which would take a significant step to correct the results of the Kelo case. That bill is now pending before the U.S. Senate.

Predictably, the Bloomberg administration opposes the bill with the same sort of a lack of transparency and misinformation it pursues in its ill-advised Willets Point proposal, to wit: Lisa Bova-Hiatt, deputy chief of the city Law Department, claims that if H.R. 1433 is passed, “important revitalization projects would not be possible” (“Bill could nix Willets project,” Times Ledger Newspapers, April 19-25).

With all due respect, Bova-Hiatt must be working on another planet because she fails to understand the issue. For hundreds of years, urban expansion has taken place with builders buying property from private owners without governmental eminent domain.

It is called free enterprise, the foundation of the capitalist system. Has anything changed? The answer is yes: It is called sordid politics and the little people be damned.

Benjamin M. Haber


Posted 12:00 am, May 21, 2012
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.


Do you know an immigrant in Queens who has made an impact on the community? Nominate a person who has made a difference for the 2018 Queens Ambassador Awards.
Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!