Now that a judge has ruled that stop-and-frisk needs to be amended, what will be next?
There have been an unusual number of non-white people who have been stopped by the police. According to the statistics compiled, 89 percent of those people were innocent of any type of criminal wrongdoing. Many people have had their constitutional rights violated because of stop-and-frisk.
Yet the public must be protected against crime, so what other alternative does law enforcement have? There has to be a solution to this issue so everyone — the public and the police — are treated fairly.
People should not have their civil rights violated just because of their race or ethnicity.
©2013 Community News Group
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.