Glendale details shelter concerns residents want included in study

Jeff Kaufman says he supports the homeless shelter opening in Glendale because the community has not historically hosted such facilities. Photo by Sarina Trangle
TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Hundreds poured into Christ the King Regional High School’s auditorium last week to share concerns about how a homeless shelter could strain Glendale: Which sewage system would the facility link into? Would it exacerbate flooding? Could it blend with the area’s mostly single- and two-family homes?

Community Board 5 organized the meeting with the city Department of Homeless Services and Samaritan Village, a Briarwood-based social service provider seeking to open a 125-family shelter at 78-16 Cooper Ave.

CB 5, civic groups and elected officials have condemned the city’s plan to enter a five-year contract with Samaritan Village for up to $27.5 million since the proposal surfaced.

But last week’s meeting was called to focus on more nuanced details of what Glendale and the surrounding communities wanted included in an environment assessment underway.

A few inquired about how the influx of 125 families may strain the sewage system and related infrastructure, noting that basements often flooded during storms. Representatives from the Juniper Park Civic and Middle Village Property Owners associations said nearby neighborhoods had fought to keep their areas comprised of mostly one-, two- and three-family homes and the shelter would ignore such endeavors.

Lisa Black, assistant commissioner of government and community relations at DHS, said the environmental study would determine which sewage system the former sewing plant and airplane part manufacturing factory would link into.

She said the review would become public if a shelter was found to be feasible and a contract was prepared for the city comptroller’s review. Black said the city would not pay for remediation work or construction costs.

Putting aside the environmental study, most speakers assailed the proposal as economically extravagant.

City Councilwoman Elizabeth Crowley (D-Glendale) said the roughly $3,000 monthly cost per family was enough to pay for luxury housing and praised the city’s attempts to revive a voucher program that kept families facing eviction in their homes for roughly $1,500 a month.

Several said it would be less expensive to convert the former Pan American Hotel in Elmhurst into a shelter, but Black said its lack of kitchens made it unsuitable for families.

Doug Apple, executive vice president at Samaritan Village, emphasized the proposal covered housing as well as an array of services to help residents with employment, education and other needs.

“The most common reason people come into the homeless system is because they’ve been evicted from their apartment. They’ve lost a job. They’ve struggled with illness,” he said. “We see our job as helping them get through that temporary crisis.”

As a recovering alcoholic who once faced eviction, John Schad said he understood the need for housing help.

But he said Glendale had a history of helping its own.

“When I needed help, I had neighbors help me get clean and sober .... my neighbors rang my doorbell and called me on the phone and gave me work,” Schad said. “If we needed a homeless shelter for our residents, we would have built the homeless shelter.”

Fellow Glendale resident Jeff Kaufman said the community needed to look beyond itself.

“There are 50-plus-thousand homeless people and there are not enough beds for families in need,” he said. “We need to address that.”

Reach reporter Sarina Trangle at 718-260-4546 or by e-mail at

Posted 12:00 am, May 30, 2014
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Joe Moretti from Jamaica says:
There should be reason for concern when you put these types of homeless shelters in a community and the concern is the people themselves and how they conduct themselves and the people who run these places that allow it to happen.

I see this first hand in Jamaica where you have two homeless shelters right near each other on 89th Avenue two blocks from Parsons Blvd. One is the El Camino, don't remember the others name in the next block. The types of people that go into these shelters and how they act when hanging out in front of these building is appalling, from their throwing litter on the ground, to their talking loudly or yelling in front of the building and other nonsense expected from this type of population. Talk about making property values go down.

The garbage situation at the El Camino was awful till I brought this up to the parent company and they have since changed that, but the fact that this place allowed it to get to this point and allow the behavior of these people in front of the building is enough to say KEEP THEM OUT.
May 30, 2014, 5:39 am
Ed from Glendale says:
Glendale is a great community to live in. It's a quiet family neighborhood that isn't over populated and unfortunately if you turn that building in to a homeless shelter it would ruin the intergrity of the neighborhood and would deter shoppers from "The Shops at Atlas Park" Regal Cinemas and also Artistice Stitch...this without even mentioning the residents of the neighborhood. I for one would look to sell and move out if this were to pass. Statistically, when shelters open up in neighborhoods like this unfortunately it doesn't being people in ot the community that would take care of their surroundings...they know they aren't going to be around for long and do not care about causing a nuisance to the residents who WILL be living there for most of or not all of their lives.

It's a terrible idea and would destroy the sense of community and pride of living in Glendale Queens! I would be ashamed to say I live in Glendale if that shelter comes to pass.
June 17, 2014, 11:22 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.


Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: