Sections

Study shows Rock Beach LIRR spur vital: Pol

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

State Assemblyman Phil Goldfeder (D-Rockaway Beach) seized on a study of reviving the Rockaway Beach LIRR spur as evidence the train had left the station.

Goldfeder said Queens College’s study projected about half a million daily riders would use the 3.5 miles of tracks between Rego Park and Ozone Park, if reactivated.

“Populations have grown in the Rockaways almost 50 percent since the closing of the old rail line. Rockaway residents and many Queens residents sadly have longer commutes to midtown Manhattan than many Nassau County residents,” Goldfeder said. “We’re asking the MTA to take the next step.”

Flanked by students, professors and transportation union members on the Flushing campus, Goldfeder suggested the study was a mandate for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to find the roughly $700 million he estimated it would cost to retool the spur.

The fate of the Rockaway Beach line has divided the borough. Some have pushed for turning the tracks into a High Line-style park dubbed the QueensWay, while transit activists are clamoring for rail service and residents close to the railbed contend both proposals would disturb their quality of life.

Queens College professor Scott Larson said the Urban Studies Department’s analysis, which was funded by college grant funds and state money, strove for objectivity.

The study found 33.9 percent of respondents preferred using the proposal to use the railbed for trains, 28.1 percent favored the QueensWay plan, 18.1 percent sought a combination of the two ideas and 10.2 percent wanted the tracks untouched. Greenery has sprouted along the railway since it stopped carrying trains in 1962.

The inquiry determined a higher portion of those in Forest Hills, Glendale and Rego Park — 39 percent — favored reactivating the line than in the Rockaways, Richmond Hill and Woodhaven, where about 31 percent supported such efforts.

Larson cautioned against reading too much into neighborhood-specific responses because just 374 residents and 44 businesses of the nearly 6,000 targeted returned surveys.

“There are a lot of people out there who aren’t very familiar with the debate,” he said.

Both the park and rail service would likely drive down property values abutting the tracks, but otherwise hike up prices, the study found.

U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan), who sits on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s Highways and Transit Sub-comittee, said the opportunity for a one-seat, 30-minute ride from Manhattan to JFK Airport should not be overlooked.

“If this region decides that the restoration of this line is a priority within our general capital plan, we’ll be able over the next five, six, eight, whatever it is, years, find $700 million,” Nadler said.

The MTA declined to comment on the prospects of Goldfeder’s pitch making it into its capital plan. The agency said it was not taking a position on the spur because it did not own the property.

City Council Transportation Committee Chairman Ydanis Rodriguez (D-Manhattan) and U.S. Reps. Gregory Meeks (D-Jamaica) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-Brooklyn) have also backed the reactivation bid.

QueensWay has support from U.S. Reps. Joseph Crowley (D-Jackson Heights), Grace Meng (D-Flushing), state Assemblyman Andrew Hevesi (D-Forest Hills), state Sen. Toby Ann Stavisky (D-Flushing) and City Councilwoman Karen Koslowitz (D-Forest Hills).

Travis Terry, part of the Friends of the QueensWay group pushing the park, said the Queens College study showed support for its proposal.

“After reviewing the findings in this study, we could not be more confident in the QueensWay’s potential to improve communities,”

Posted 12:00 am, November 13, 2014
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Philip McManus from Queens says:
Dear Commuters,

Please help us help you.

Are you tired of dangerous, overcrowded, slow and unreliable transportation?

Are you fed up with City Hall separating, isolating, and discriminating against us, which creates poverty, crime and suffering for the people in Queens and the outer boroughs?

It's time to act! Join our group and fight back.

Do you need faster transportation including the QueensRail (RBL) or do you want gridlock, tickets and poverty?

Don't let City Hall beat us.

We need you to support the QueensRail, Citywide Ferry, Bus, Train, Roadway, etc. expansion.

Please write and tell others to write to the media and our elected leaders.

Show your unity for faster and safer transportation for our region.

Lets get organized.

God Bless you and your family.

Philip McManus, Chairman
Queens Public Transit Committee
PhilAMcManus@gmail.com
718-679-5309

Queens Public Transit Committee
Faster transportation will create more social, economic, recreational, and environmental opportunities.

Facebook:
Rockaway Beach Rail Line
Queens Public Transit
Rockaway Beach Branch

Twitter:
Rockaway Beach Line

Websites:
Rockaway Branch Line blog
Rockaway Branch Line Mission Statement
Queens Public Transit
Oct. 5, 2015, 5:18 pm
Eugene Falik from Far Rockaway says:
Typical MTA: "The MTA declined to comment on the prospects of Goldfeder’s pitch making it into its capital plan. The agency said it was not taking a position on the spur because it did not own the property."

But the neither the MTA nor the NYC Transit Authority which actually runs the trains owns any part of the subway system. The spur, as all of the subway system, is owned by NYC and leased to the Transit Authority.
Oct. 6, 2015, 11:28 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

@timesledgernews
Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!