Markey pushes child victims bill

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

As Pope Francis concluded his historic trip to the United States, he told a group of sexual abuse victims in Philadelphia that “God weeps for the sexual abuse of children.”

For Assemblywoman Margaret Markey (D-Maspeth), who has spent nearly a decade trying to pass a bill that would eliminate the statute of limitations for sex crimes against children, his remarks didn’t go nearly far enough in addressing the church’s role in perpetrating and enabling child abuse.

A Catholic, Markey said that she is deeply concerned with the church’s legacy in America, and had hoped the Pope would spur a moral reckoning within the church hierarchy to help victims find closure and bring them back into the fold.

“Part of the reason church attendance is dwindling,” Markey speculated, “is that they refuse to address the issue of sexual abuse of children. This is an issue that is crying out for attention from voters, too. They want to see justice for victims.”

Markey’s bill would do away with the statute of limitations in New York state for victims of child sex abuse, which currently gives them until the age of 23 to file a civil or criminal claim against their abusers. It would also create a “civil window” to suspend the existing statute of limitations on civil cases for one year, so that those who were victimized before the law was enacted can bring suits against individuals or private institutions involved in past crimes. However, it would not eliminate the criminal statute of limitations for these crimes.

In September, Markey sent a letter inviting the Pope to meet with members of the New York State Legislature and child abuse victims advocacy organizations and lend support to the bill, known as The Child Victims Act. “I respectfully plead with Pope Francis to intervene with New York bishops, to melt their hearts, to convince them to adopt his own message of healing and reconciliation toward survivors of child sexual abuse,” she wrote. The Vatican did not offer a response, but a memorandum from the The New York State Catholic Conference argues that the Act is unfair to private entities, and supports a separate bill that would extend the statute of limitations to 10 years. The Catholic Conference has vigorously opposed the bill, along with several Orthodox Jewish groups, which fear potentially devastating financial implications of allowing victims, regardless of age, to bring lawsuits for sexual abuse suffered in childhood.

Meanwhile, the prospects in Albany for Markey’s bill are once again uncertain. The bill has gone through a number of iterations since being introduced in the 2006-07 legislative session, and has passed in the Democrat-dominated Assembly four times, but it had never been brought up for a vote in the Republican-controlled Senate. Earlier this year, despite receiving a record number of sponsors, including more than a dozen Republicans, the bill stalled yet again.

“I want to put the members of both houses in a position where they have to make a major moral decision on this issue,” Markey said. “I’m optimistic that the bill will pass both houses.”

“The church knows that in New York state there are dozens or perhaps hundreds of current and former child-molesting employees, and high-ranking church officials who ignored past crimes,” said David Clohessy, the director of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests. “They don’t want that in the public.”

Reach reporter Gabriel Rom by e-mail at or by phone at (718) 260–4564.

Posted 12:00 am, October 13, 2015
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

Michael Skiendzielewski from Philadelphia, PA says:
When will our elected officials and political leaders in both Albany and Harrisburg show the moral courage and personal commitment to act in the best interests of ALL children in both states when it comes to the protection and rights of children relative to childhood sexual abuse?

How dare any person, official or citizen deny childhood victims of such horrific criminal acts fair and reasonable access to legal redress of these allegations, both civilly and criminally. It is indeed most offensive that some of the most vehement deniers of legal access to child sexual abuse victims are leaders and members of our Roman Catholic faith.

Michael Skiendzielewski
Captain (Retired)
Philadelphia Police Dept.
Oct. 13, 2015, 7:59 am
christine johnson from makaha,hawaii says:
Why is the catholic church even allowed to interfere in State and Federal legislation..?

Hawaii legislators ignored the catholic church lobby who came in to complain and try to shoot down legislation to remove the statute of limitations child sexual abuse.

Hawaii legislators are of many cultures and religions and non religions.. They appear to care about children and not about the old boys club of the catholic church who try to stuff their religion down our throats..

Pope francis made a saint out of a Franciscan priest who was a violent , sadistic. enabler of rape, torture, enslavement and ultimately annihilation of native California Indians.. how much louder can pope francis be about his stance on abuse..??

Legislators and state and federal leaders need to stop giving this pope and his historically murderous religion/church any power at all.. on any subject and especially on matters of child sexual abuse.. ?
Oct. 13, 2015, 12:27 pm
Jeanne from Northern NJ says:
This past weekend, an awe inspiring man named Fred Marigliano, arrived at the NJ and NY Stateline. He and his wife, Maggie, wrapped up a month long walk of the state of NJ from Cape May to Mahwah. Why? To bring awareness to long needed SOL reform for child sexual abuse victims in NJ via NJ bills S868 and A3664. They walked to the “Welcome to NY” sign at the Suffern border. Once there, NY’s Bills, S00063 and A02872, came immediately to mind. Yes, Marge Markey, the Child Victims Act needs to get passed. I do hope you are successful.
Oct. 13, 2015, 9 pm
Mike vanauken from Oneida says:
This bill has more to do with political advancement and lawyers making money then it does protecting children. If the true intentions of the Markey bill had the children in mind she would seperate the ones who suffered abuse in a public school from ones who suffered in a private one. Jmo
Oct. 14, 2015, 3:12 pm
Mike vanauken from Oneida says:
Would not
Oct. 14, 2015, 3:13 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.


Do you know an immigrant in Queens who has made an impact on the community? Nominate a person who has made a difference for the 2018 Queens Ambassador Awards.
Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!