Sections

CB11 education committee disapproves of proposed high school

A larger-than-normal public turnout was drawn to Community Board 11's education committee meeting as members met with SCA officials regarding the newly proposed high school in Bayside.
TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Members of Community Board 11 who attended Tuesday’s Education Committee meeting unanimously shot down a motion to recommend approving the city School Construction Authority’s proposal to build a new 739-seat high school in Bayside.

The recommendation will be taken into consideration when the full board votes on the proposal Monday, Nov. 2.

The SCA has been under contract to purchase the Bayside Jewish Center, 203-05 32nd Ave., following the required 45-day public review period that began Oct. 5. But the proposal to spend $114 million to build a high school on the 1.1-acre lot immediately drew fire from members of the community.

They claim the already heavily trafficked, yet narrow 32nd Avenue connects Bayside High School to its athletic fields and is in close proximity to PS 159, so adding more buses, pedestrians, cars and parked cars to the roadway can only make it more congested and dangerous—making it an inappropriate location for a new high school.

The discussion with representatives from the SCA and the city Department of Education seemed to only reinforce that notion for the 16 board members who were present.

Although for some residents it feels as if the SCA imposes its site selection process on communities rather than working with them, the agency’s chief of staff, Melanie La Rocca, said she changed the planning process for Bayside.

“We’re committed to having the conversation and engaging the community on what kind of school goes in here,” La Rocca said , even though this is usually only considered after a school is already built. “The commitment from the department was to try and align these conversations between a possible user and moving the site through public review.”

She tried to explain why the SCA thought the 32nd Avenue site was a better fit for a high school than several others the agencies deemed inappropriate.

The SCA said the proposed site already has the utility infrastructure in place, making it less expensive and less time-consuming to build there. It also said School District 26, which has three high-demand high schools, is overcrowded and is the only district in Queens where the city has not yet made progress in creating more seats.

In its capital plan, the SCA has funded 2,800 new school seats of the nearly 5,000 it has deemed needed in the borough.

But as board member Dave Solano pointed out, Bayside High School, which was at 158 percent of its enrollment capacity in 2013, serves many students from out of the district with its specialty programs, so the DOE accepts more students than necessary into high schools that are already overcrowded.

“There is no student in our community who is turned away from their high school. Students who chose to go to other schools is because of the city’s open enrollment.”

The DOE said 58 percent of District 26 residents choose to go to the schools they are zoned for. Others are always given the opportunity to attend local schools, but seek specialty programs in other parts of the city. Just the same, students from elsewhere seek programs in Bayside.

Reach reporter Tom Momberg by e-mail at tmomberg@cnglocal.com or by phone at (718) 260–4573.

Posted 12:00 am, October 30, 2015
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

go where you live from Queens says:
It is ridiculous that kids are allowed to go to high schools out of their area. This means Bayside area schools have many students from outside the area. Go where you live. If this was the rule, parents would get involved and help improve schools that have a lower success rate among their students.
Nov. 2, 2015, 11:26 am
Resident from Bayside says:
Public Authorities, Article 8, Title 6, Sections 1725-1748

§ 1730. Exemption from land use review procedures and other requirements. 1. […] neither (a) the establishment or amendment of an educational facilities capital plan and actions relating to the financing thereof, […] shall be subject to the provisions of any general, special or local law, city charter, administrative code, ordinance or resolution governing uniform land use review procedures, any other land use planning review and approvals, historic preservation procedures, architectural reviews, franchise approvals and other state or local review and approval procedures governing the use of land and the improvements thereon within the city. Capital projects for educational facilities to be undertaken by the authority shall not be subject to the provisions of the charter of the city relating to site selection, land use review procedures […] The authority shall be subject to zoning regulations to the same extent that the city board is subject to such regulations, if at all.

§ 1732. City approval of sites. 1. Following the hearings held pursuant to section seventeen hundred thirty-one of this title, but prior to initiating construction of new educational facilities, the
authority shall submit the site plan of such projects to the mayor and the council for review, provided, however, that such review shall be limited to the site selected for the project. […] 3. The city may not require the authority to conduct any further hearings or seek any further approvals as a condition for receiving city approval. 4. If the council or mayor disapproves the site plan, (a) the authority may, after consultation with the city board, revise such site plan for resubmission pursuant to section seventeen hundred thirty-one of this title and this section or (b) the authority may, with the agreement of the city board and chancellor, eliminate such site plan from the five-year educational facilities capital plan.
Nov. 9, 2015, 2:17 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

Classifieds

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: