Sections

Work continues at Garaufis house as city restores permits

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Work has been allowed to continue on the land where the Bayside house formerly owned by federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis once stood.

A stop work order for 218-15 40th Ave. was issued in July due to the Alt-1 permit being revoked for work that exceeded the scope of the original plans. The violations have been dismissed, according to a Department of Buildings spokesman, and a new Alt-1 permit was issued in mid-August and took effect in mid-September.

It was not clear why the violations were dropped.

Controversy about the house began brewing in April after neighbor Bonnie Skala Kiladitis noticed the renovations to the four-story house taking a turn for the extreme. Within days, the home had been reduced to the first floor.

An Alt-1 permit requires at least 50 percent of the original structure to be retained during the renovation of any home. The DOB, however, reissued an Alt-1 in this case on the basis that the foundations were still intact and because the building plans had been revised and approved for an Alt-1, a DOB spokesman said. He pointed out that it is at the discretion of a plan examiner to determine how much of the original structure needs to remain to call for an Alt-1.

State Sen. Tony Avella (D-Bayside) has kept an eye on the situation with the property and said the DOB informed him the new Alt-1 permit is what is known as a Big Alt-1 and allows renovation to exceed the usual 50 percent required to be retained.

“Now we just have to make sure that the owner follows through on what the permit says,” Avella said. “They should have done a better job in the first place of analyzing the first Alt-1, and making sure the letter of the law was followed. You know, any developer or property owner when remodeling a house does what the permit says. There’s a reason building and zoning code exist. Unfortunately, the DOB does not do a good job, and it relies on the community to raise the issue, which I think is really a backwards approach.”

However, a DOB spokesman said in August the owners no longer qualified for an alteration permit and would be required to apply for a new building permit.

The stately home was purchased for $1.5 million by a real estate agent from New Jersey who identified herself as Lisa and said it would be occupied only by her family. Lisa, who did not disclose her last name, was baffled by the opposition her building project attracted from the neighborhood.

“There’s a lot of new construction in Bayside. I don’t know why there’s concern over our house,” she said back in April, referring to other projects in her neighborhood.

But many held the home in high regard and contended that it had historical value which cannot be replaced.

“It infuriates me as to how they have bastardized that gorgeous house,” Richard Doyle, a nearby resident said. “You know it really gets me, because they know what they are doing when they tear down too much of a house and won’t keep with the plans. I get tired of people being able to do this and the [DOB] does nothing.”

Garaufis’ house is believed to have been built circa 1890 and was the one of the personal residences of the Lawrence family, influential members of the early Bayside community. A study conducted by Bayside Historical Society Treasurer Paul Graziano found the Lawrence Estate eligible for the National and State Register of Historic Places. This recognition, however, carries no protection from demolition or alteration.

Kiladitis, daughter of late community activist Frank Skala, got elected officials involved in the fate of the house on 40th Avenue and looked to it as an example of a zoning violation epidemic in the community.

Reach reporter Mark Hallum by e-mail at mhallum@cnglocal.com or by phone at (718) 260–4564.

Posted 12:00 am, October 6, 2016
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Anon from Bayside says:
Wow, Violation dismissed???????
That's a green light for more unscrupulous development to continue!
Goodbye Bayside, hello Beijing.....
Oct. 6, 2016, 9:29 am
joe bloe from bayside says:
The violation was for the construction fence NOT HAVING VIEWING PANELS not for exceeding the scope of the permit, it's on the DOB website. The viewing panels are for the nosy neighbors and the Avella's making un-educated complaints. There is another alteration type 1 filed because the area was increased not because the building was demolished.
Oct. 6, 2016, 11:54 am
Citizen from bayside says:
AGREE with Anon from Bayside!
Why follow rules that Americans must?? Just payoff the buildings dept inspectors and permit issue dept.!!!
Oct. 6, 2016, 3:01 pm
No lives says:
Perhaps everyone needs to just mind their own business. I don't understand why people keep referring to the house as Gaurafis property....it's not anymore. Get over it and do something with your own lives.
Oct. 6, 2016, 8:25 pm
Huh?? says:
TimesLedger must be running out of things to report on. This is old news. New house is coming up. Get over it
Oct. 6, 2016, 8:28 pm
Anon from Bayside says:
No Lives & Huh,
You must be Lisa the owner or another sneaky law-breaking Asian wanting to do the same!
Oct. 7, 2016, 6:41 am
No lives says:
Anon,
Why bring race into it? I just don't see why everyone is so butt hurt over these new homes. Everyone is entitled to do as they please with their property. I'm Italian-American since you're so quick to jump to racial insults.

You are the stereotype of someone always complaining about stereotypes.
Oct. 7, 2016, 9:54 am
Chicklet says:
The lesson here is anyone can purchase a house and then demolish it to build the house you want.

Zoning, building codes, laws all mean nothing in New York City, just file any old plan, do whatever you want and if the neighbors complain you'll pay a little fine and waste a couple of months.

New York City allows 'self-certification', your builder can say "oh yes, I built it right" and will get away with it.

Next time think carefully before voting in the same old corrupt politicians. Bah!
Oct. 7, 2016, 7:59 pm
Anon from Bayside says:
No Lives,You are totally wrong, NOBODY is entitled to do WHATEVER they please with their property, we have LAWS which the majority of new Asian immigrant implants have learned to exploit!!!!!!!

NOBODY has the right to infringe on MY rights!!!
Oct. 8, 2016, 2:36 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

MetroPlus NY Cancer and Blood Specialists NYU Winthrop VillageCareMax

Classifieds

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: