An uneasy compromise

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Despite the arrival of summer, a slight chill settled on Queens after the Supreme Court ruled this week that a limited version of President Donald Trump’s travel ban could be implemented.

The decision, which was unsigned, allowed a weaker version of the original ban on travelers from six mostly Muslim countries to take effect within days until the justices weigh in on the case in October.

The nation’s highest court acted on the highly charged issue during the Muslim holiday Eid-al-Fitr, which Trump refused to celebrate even though his predecessors had marked the end of Ramadan in the White House for at least 20 years.

As the Supreme Court partially backed his order targeting the Muslim countries, followers of the religion were observing the holiday as “a time of forgiveness.”

This was not lost on Queens’ Muslim community, which has been faced with rising bias incidents since Trump took office. Security has been beefed up around mosques and elected officials have held seminars to instruct the community about their rights if confronted by federal agents threatening to arrest them.

Under the revised order, visitors from Libya, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen will not be banned from the United States, but must have what the court called “a bona fide” connection to obtain visas, which means having a job with a U.S. company, close relatives living here or a spot in an American university.

The experts are debating the impact of the ruling, which is not expected to produce the chaos that enveloped Kennedy Airport in January, when some Muslim travelers were detained, a few were sent back home and lawyers rushed to JFK to provide free legal aid. The New York Immigration Coalition will have attorneys available this time as well.

Business travelers could be caught up in a web of red tape as the Trump administration fine-tunes its vetting process and lawsuits are likely to come regarding just what constitutes a “bona fide” relationship.

But beyond the details, the message is loud and clear that people from certain Muslim countries do not have the same status as other immigrants when waiting at the gates to the United States.

Trump’s Islamophobic comments about Muslims, such as “they’re sick people,” smack of the religious discrimination that prompted several lower courts to reject his travel ban on constitutional grounds.

We are hopeful that the nine justices will conclude in October that Trump’s campaign to discourage Muslims from entering the United States is a violation of our founding fathers’ vision of a nation where freedom from religious intolerance was meant for everyone.

Posted 12:00 am, June 30, 2017
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Ban them from Queens says:
Good! Why should he break bread with a bunch of people who REFUSE to behave and blend in with american society? I'm glad he put laws on them, we have enough problem people in this country of our own, we dont need more! Also, he should BAN muslim women from dressing in their long black clothes and covering up their faces. How does one know if they are carrying explosive devices or not and how would we know who they are if they decide to ever go off the deep end and rob a bank or murder someone and there is no description that one can give of them because their damn faces are covered? They need to step into the 21st century and stop this garbage where they do what their own motherlands and husbands want them to do! You live in America so wake up and blend in!
June 30, 2017, 11:52 pm
John LaPorte from Whitestone says:
A lot has been written recently regarding "fake news" and I would hope that your editorials would not be an example of that. Unfortunately, this one is. When Donald Trump made his comment “they’re sick people,” it was neither Islamophobic nor directed at all Muslims. That comment was specifically aimed at those who support or engage in violent Jihad. So, let's try to stick to the whole truth.

You then suggest that the President wants to "discourage Muslims from entering the United States." How could that possibly be when this temporary travel restriction doesn't even apply to two of the world's largest Muslim countries, Indonesia and Egypt? So, please stop with the name calling and focus on the facts in their entirety.
July 8, 2017, 4:24 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.


Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: