On Nov. 7, I plan on voting NO to Proposal 1 calling for a state Constitutional Convention for the following reasons:
I resent the fact this proposal will appear on the back of the ballot. There is no valid reason why the proposal does not appear on the front. I believe this is intentional so that voters will be unaware or simply neglect to turn the ballot to its reverse side. This does not comport with good and irresponsible government.
The electorate will not know specifically what changes will be sought if there is a convention, until the convention.
General statements are insufficient. I want to know exactly what will be sought at a convention. The only specific item floating around is to alter or deprive civil service workers of their pensions, which I do not approve of.
Lack of transparency is reason enough to vote NO to Proposal 1.
Benjamin M. Haber
©2017 Community News Group
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.