MTA made wrong decision to ban alcohol advertising

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

The decision by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to ban alcohol advertising (TimesLedger story/ Nov. 3) is misguided and unsupported by the scientific research.

Parents and other adults are the most influential factors in a youth’s decision whether or not to drink alcohol, not advertising. In fact, over the last 10 years, underage drinking has declined by more than 20 percent in New York and binge drinking is at an all-time low.

Decades of scientific research show that alcohol advertising does not cause someone to begin drinking, let alone abuse alcohol. The assertion that alcohol advertising causes underage drinking is based on highly flawed advocacy-driven “research” that has been refuted by advertising experts in the scientific community.

For example, a recent study from the University of Texas analyzed the relationship between annual alcohol advertising expenditures and per capita sales of beer, wine and spirits in the U.S. from 1971-2012. Over a 40-year span, the researchers found that per-capita alcohol consumption remained essentially constant, with changes occurring only between the three beverage alcohol categories – beer, wine and distilled spirits. Conversely, during the same time frame, alcohol advertising media expenditures increased almost 400 percent.

The University of Texas researchers concluded that advertising is a means to gain market share and “proposals to restrict or curtail truthful, commercial messages about a legal product work against rational public policy.” The researchers also emphasized that “the outcomes of this study can be used to inform relevant public policy discussions regarding alcohol beverage advertising.”

The nation’s distillers are committed to responsible advertising and have a proud and proven history of successful self-regulation through our industry’s Code of Responsible Practices. The FTC, the lead federal agency charged with consumer protection, has repeatedly reaffirmed the spirits industry’s responsible advertising practices.

Other localities, including Chicago, Charlotte and Washington D.C., have recently overturned bans on alcohol advertising on public transit with each city experiencing absolutely no negative effects. We urge the MTA to reconsider its decision and base its policy on scientific evidence, not scaremongering.

Jay Hibbard

Vice President of the Distilled Spirits Council

Washington, D.C.

Posted 12:00 am, November 13, 2017
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Pedro Valdez-Rivera says:
I guess that the MTA have made a conscious move that public safety is the number one priority over everything else.
Dec. 1, 2017, 3:08 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!