NE Queens residents leery about bioswales’ unintended consequences

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Last year the city Department of Environmental Protection painted green letters on the sidewalks of houses in Queens.

Civic leaders spent weeks finding out that the green lettering meant that the DEP was considering putting bioswales, or rain gardens, on the sidewalk next to the curb.

A bioswale was described as an area alongside the curb 4 feet wide fitting in the green strip between the sidewalk and the curb from 6 to 10 feet long. The city digs down about 10 feet to see if the soil can absorb water, then can put in soil and rocks to catch rainwater. There can be plants or bushes or tall grass or trees in them.

The homeowners of northeast Queens are exceptionally civic-minded and join civic associations to fight for their quality of life. Homeowners who live in Fresh Meadows, Hillcrest and Bayside are represented by state Sen. Tony Avella, who took up the battle against these bioswales.

After rallies, phone calls and meetings, the EPA agreed to not place these things in Avella’s district until there could be a better evaluation of the proposal.

This is supposed to include drilling to determine if a location picked for a rain garden actually is a good location. Months have gone by and civic associations are getting more and more restless.

Bioswales have been put in other areas of Queens, which were not so vocal, and we are getting negative reports.

Homeowners at the February meeting of the Queens Civic Congress say that some of these things have paper, coffee cups, and dog droppings in them. Originally the city said it would have teams going around cleaning them, but then it said that homeowners might want to clean them.

Now civic leaders say they just have trash in them and nobody comes to clean them. There were negative reports from all over Queens yet one positive suggestion made at this meeting was that if the city gave homeowners a tax rebate, they might accept these bioswales.

The reason for these things is that the New York state wants the city to cut down on groundwater flowing into our rivers and bays. Yet it is the incompetence of the city agencies which is causing the run-off of rain water because people have been paving over their front and side lawns when they build McMansions.

The city has not required that more of the lawn space around houses is left green or the driveways are actually paved with paving blocks, which can absorb the rain.

The city says that people can pave over an area if they put in a drywell or material to absorb water under the paving blocks but it doesn’t enforce its own rules.

Civic leaders have also suggested that the city loosen the hard-packed-down soil in tree beds so water can be absorbed better.

Also, people seeing how poorly the city is removing weeds from the beds of the trees it has planted don’t trust the city to take care of the bioswales. It is terrible that there are green markings on sidewalks in front of shops along Union Turnpike on newly paved sidewalks.

A rally just called by Avella and state Assemblyman Michael Simanowitz in front of a house on 36th Avenue in Bayside exposed the problem of the terrible noise made by the EPA when they drilled to study the soil.

An article about this recent rally says that the city is offering green strips, which look like a strip of grass or a porous sidewalk, which looks like concrete. What?

Another problem is that some areas marked with those green lines have gas lines and underground sprinkler heads in them and deep water or a sewer line.

Has the EPA hit any of these underground mains yet?



Posted 12:00 am, March 6, 2017
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like TimesLedger on Facebook.

Reader feedback

Will from Park Slope says:
These bioswales pose a grave threat to our precious bodily fluids!
March 6, 2017, 12:30 pm
Daniel from Fresh Meadows says:
They drilled on 167 St. in Fresh Meadows last week.
March 6, 2017, 5:42 pm
Al Key from Carnegie Hill says:
Why dont they just put the bioswales under the pavement?
March 8, 2017, 6:58 am
tyc from queens says:
Bioswales: Public interest versus Homeowners’ interest

Creating bioswales in front of selected residential homes ignores certain people’s quality of life. These people are the homeowners that invested substantial of their hard earned savings in a home, neighborhood, and surrounding. DEP are making conscious decision that directly impacts homeowners’ surrounding without first requesting for their concerns and inputs.

Some communities have voiced their concern and temporary halted bioswales project by opting out of the program from happening to their area. The opportunity to opt-out of any situation that doesn’t seem logical to homeowners’ intuition is great. However, this wishful thinking wouldn’t last forever and before anyone noticed, the opt-out option may get invalidated because these bioswales sites sits on city property.

I feel there are other areas that most local news have not touch on and would like offer my thoughts relating to bioswales program.

1. Current bioswales project offers only 2 cosmetic selections for homeowners. In all due respect, this unwanted gift is a joke. DEP could and should have more options (mix and match various types of plants / trees / bushes) for homeowners to choose.

2. I don’t believe the “Row bioswales” structural design is suitable for residential area. Since most residential area has small sidewalk and less debris on the street, I believe “Check Dam bioswales” might be a feasible alternative.

Think of a puddle, which collects storm water from houses and pavements in the surrounding areas. After the storm, the storm water collected in the puddle slowly descents into the ground.

3. City agency is responsible to bioswales maintenance. However, city agency isn’t always available when biowales get dirty, collected debris / litters / trashes / obstructions / garbage / refuse / rubbish / nuisances of every kind and other offensive material. It might takes week or months before someone arrives to clean up the mess. In the end, homeowners may still have to clean up. DEP should provide contact information and maintenance schedule to homeowners.

4. City agency is responsible for maintenance. Nowhere relating to information concerning liability from negligence, vandalism, or failure to clean up. There are other city agencies (example sanitation or ECB), state or federal agency that could issue ticket and penalize homeowners. If DEP creates it, then DEP is responsible to reimburse any bioswales tickets / fines / summons incurred to homeowners.

Thank you for your time in reading this.
June 13, 2017, 8:39 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

MetroPlus NY Cancer and Blood Specialists NYU Winthrop VillageCareMax


Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: