Sections

A comparison of presidential races

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

During World War II, our nation was strongly united in the war effort. Toward the end of WWII in 1945, there was more freedom of opportunity.

This was especially true in the Democratic Party, where members became split based on strongly held viewpoints.

We had such a situation just before the Civil War, when the Democratic Party was divided at that time and a united Republican Party elected Abraham Lincoln president.

In 1948, the Democratic convention was held in Philadelphia and the Democratic Party was also split at that time.

That year the vote was split three ways with the regular organization supporting Harry Truman for president, the Dixiecrats backing Strom Thurmond and the progressives of the party supporting Henry Wallace for president.

Meanwhile, on the Republican side, Gov. Thomas Dewey of New York easily obtained the nomination of the Republicans and led a united party against the Democrats, who were divided into three factions.

In a situation such as this, political observers everywhere were predicting a landslide victory for Thomas Dewey over Harry Truman.

It was believed that the Democratic vote, split three ways, would sink Truman, and the polls showed Dewey far ahead.

The situation in 1860 was different from what it was in 1948, while Lincoln was able to get the nomination for the Republican Party and go on to beat the Democrats in the fall election that year.

In 1948, President Truman ran a hard-fought race, but Dewey was not running a tough campaign.

By the end of the campaign on Election Night, Truman had beat Dewey by a 49-to-45 percent margin and was elected president after becoming vice president in 1945 with the passing of President Franklin Roosevelt.

It seemed to be the case that so many people were so sure that Thomas Dewey was going to win that they didn’t bother to go to the polls to vote for him. It turned out to be the biggest upset in the history of American presidential elections up until that time.

When we look at the forthcoming 2020 presidential election, two years from now, we can see a case developing whereby there are primaries in both parties, especially the Democratic Party, that could lead to a situation similar to 1948.

Someone might challenge President Donald Trump in the Republican primaries and when we look back at the Republican primaries in 2016, there were 17 candidates running.

There may be at least several Democratic candidates running in 2020 for their party’s nomination for president. One thing we can say for sure is that the next presidential election is going to be filled with points of turmoil as we move forward in the election process.

In 2020, Hillary Clinton is not expected to run again, but there are numerous candidates, especially in the U.S. Senate and governorships who might be interested in running.

It will be interesting to see how the presidential marathon unfolds and concludes in 2020.

Posted 12:00 am, August 12, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

Dwayne from Queens says:
#walkaway
Aug. 12, 7:09 am
Mea says:
If anybody here is interested in trading I recently found a great website and they are running a special right now. Just Google the website Emini S&P Trading Secret, this is an excellent place to go to learn to trade. I'm glad I found them because they are nice people and very helpful and knowledgeable about trading. And their support is the best I've seen I email them in they email me back in five minutes, it's really a great place they should all be like that.
Aug. 13, 12:19 am
Jerry from Elmhurst says:
Had there been a greater turnout in 1948, studies showed that Truman would have benefitted, not Dewey.

2016 does not compare with 1948. According to Nate Silver of 538.com, Trump had a one-in-three chance of winning on election eve. In 1948, with his party split three ways, Truman had NO chance of winning. That election remains the greatest upset in American history
Aug. 13, 7:03 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

Classifieds

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: