Lawsuit reveals flawed census citizenship question

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The decision to include a specific question on citizenship on the upcoming 2020 Census is a controversial one, long suspected to be motivated by politics rather than practicality. The U.S. Census is intended to count all persons living in America, including non-citizens. Critics suggest that the inclusion of such a question, for the first time in nearly 70 years, is designed to suppress cooperation and response rates in predominantly immigrant communities.

Now evidence revealed in a federal lawsuit suggests that U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has long intended to add the question to the Census, well before such an addition was subject to rigorous review and over the objections of staff, committees and previous directors.

Critics include former Census Director Kenneth Prewitt, who led the 2000 Census and said the question would almost certainly discourage cooperation and run contrary to the constitutional mandate to “count every person.”

The consequences of an inaccurate census are far-reaching. The Census guides and informs federal funding as well as determining seats in Congress and the Electoral College.

For states like New York that are expecting to gradually lose population — either due to faster growth in other states or net migration — this will overstate the change in population. States that stand to gain from migration, such as Texas, will also lose in that the true extent of the population increase and by extension their representation in Congress will be suppressed.

In response to these concerns, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit June 8 on behalf of immigrants’ rights groups, including the New York Immigrant Coalition and Make the Road New York, which operates in Queens, claiming that the return of the citizenship question was motivated by “discrimina­tory animus.”

Officially, the Trump administration has maintained that the reason for the inclusion of the citizenship question is to “protect voting rights” and they are doing so by way of guidance originating in the Justice Department. However, the ACLU litigation has forced the release of government records, including e-mails, in which Ross was adamant about reintroducing the “citizenship question” long before the purported date of the DOJ request in December 2017. The documents referenced conversations with Steve Bannon, at the time a key White House adviser and avowed “nationalist” who has long opposed immigrations in all forms.

Though a key justification for the inclusion of the citizenship question is that such a question appears on the American Community Survey, which compiles data for the Census, the origins of that justification have been found to come from Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach. He is infamous for inventing claims of voter fraud perpetrated by undocumented immigrants without evidence. Kobach’s investigation stalled after near universal opposition from all states to turning over voter data.

Critics have long held that such “voter fraud” investigations serve only to purge legal voters from voter rolls and increase the difficulty minorities would have in reaching the polls.

Kobach’s emails revealed that he, too, had spoken with Bannon about the “citizenship question.” In light of this evidence, the federal government’s credibility is highly doubtful.

After testifying that the process had been initiated by the DOJ in December, Ross has backtracked on his testimony, admitting that the notion of a citizenship question was being discussed long before September. With the evidence that has come to light, the federal lawsuit will proceed to trial in the fall.

Legal or not, all New Yorkers would lose in a Census that intentionally attempts to undercount undocumented persons and their families for political reasons.

The ACLU investigation has revealed beyond a shadow of a doubt the architect of the proposed changes to the Census to be anti-immigrant forces determined to suppress the votes of immigrants who are citizens. The idea that such data was necessary to protect voter rights was always a flimsy justification and now a complete fabrication.

Posted 12:00 am, August 11, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

Dwayne from Queens says:
Prashad negates the fact that 'non-citizens' refers to legal immigrants awaiting lawful US citizenship status. The question he's bellyaching about does not apply to illegally-entered intruders and visa-violators. Once again, Prashad put down that ham sandwich, join a gym, and start telling it like it for real---and not YOUR version of 'real' for the purposes of gaining an audience and attention.
Aug. 11, 7:40 am
Helton from Flushing says:
Blah blah blah...Our friend Calvin once again tries to rationalize illegal immigration, but fails miserably.

Calvin - don't you believe in obeying the law? Don't all of us have to obey the law every day or else we end up arrested and possibly go to jail?

If you do, then how can you justify people illegally entering the USA? Or is it okay to break THAT law, but not others?

As someone who worked in law enforcement, why don't you try RESPECTING the law for a change?

If you don't like the law, then work to change the law. But, until that day comes, illegal immigration is against the law.

Have some respect for the law Calvin.

And let me ask you about your quote..."Critics have long held that such voter fraud investigations serve only to purge legal voters from voter rolls and INCREASE THE DIFFICULTY MINORITIES WOULD HAVE IN REACHING THE POLLS."

Tell us Calvin - Since we're in NYC, how would minorities have more trouble in reaching the polls?
...Did the trains and buses stop running?
...Did they close the voting sites in minority neighborhoods?
...Are there armed guards stopping people from entering the voting sites?

Do you realize how ridiculous and nonsensical your comments are?

And tell me Calvin, you say that "The U.S. Census is intended to count all persons living in America, including non-citizens."

Says who?

Isn't it more logical that the census should count ONLY people who have a right to be in the country legally?

Plus, by counting illegals, that gives sanctuary states like NY, NJ, and CA more money because their population is larger ONLY because they have welcomed ILLEGALS who break the law to live in their states.

Therefore, you believe that breaking the law should have no consequences. In fact, you believe that breaking the law should benefit those who encourage breaking the law.

Gee, THAT makes sense.

Again it comes down to respecting the law, and you consistently have shown that you have no respect.

I wonder what your thoughts would be if god forbid, someone in your family was hurt or worse by an illegal drunk driver.
Aug. 11, 5:20 pm
Mea says:
A great way to earn money nowadays is by doing Emini S&P trading. Google Emini S&P Trading Secret to learn a strategy that really works. They have the most accurate method to use in order to become successful in trading the Emini S&P market.
Aug. 13, 12:21 am
tired of the nonsense from Queens says:
Calvin, if you don't like it here, you are free to leave. The way we do things in America is take a census to count the number of citizens. Vacationers, students, visitors, etc are not part of this process. Live and learn.
Aug. 14, 4:24 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.


Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: