Sections

Environmentalists speak out against proposed LaGuardia AirTrain

Environmentalists have raised objection to the Port Authority’s plan for a rail link to LaGuardia Airport after the original route running alongside the Grand Central Parkway was moved closer to Flushing Bay.
TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Environmentalists are voicing their opposition against the latest route of the proposed LaGuardia AirTrain.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey launched an environmental review process when it filed a series of analyses with the Federal Aviation Administration last Thursday, listing 20 options to improve access to the airport including express bus lanes, ferry service and a previously proposed extension of the Astoria line.

The agency made clear its “preferred alternative” is an elevated train operating between LaGuardia and Willets Point, with transfers to the Long Island Rail Road and the MTA’s No. 7 subway line, a proposal favored by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“As is the case with any critical infrastructure project, public input and a thorough evaluation of all alternatives is paramount,” Port Authority Executive Director Rick Cotton said. “Our goal is to provide LaGuardia Airport passengers with a convenient, reliable world-class rail connection with travel times below 30 minutes from midtown Manhattan. We’re grateful for the invaluable community input that has guided our planning thus far and look forward to additional engagement as the FAA proceeds with the formal environmental review.”

In the original proposal, the AirTrain was to run alongside the Grand Central Parkway but after complaints from Community Board 3 and civic associations representing neighborhoods that surround LaGuardia Airport, the Port Authority went back to the drawing board and developed a new route that would move the route closer to Flushing Bay and away from residential neighborhoods.

The Guardians of Flushing Bay announced its opposition to the project on Friday. The coalition of dragon-boaters, residents and citywide partners called the proposed route a threat to parkland, a burden to residents, and a backwards step in New York City’s move toward climate resilience.

“Guardians urges PANYNJ to redefine its goals for the project from prioritizing new construction to prioritizing all New Yorkers,” the Guardians said in a statement. “In an area starved of parks and crisscrossed by highways, the preferred route passes over more than a quarter of the Flushing Bay promenade and takes away parkland. Resting in a 100-year flood plan, the promenade could act as a climate resilient sponge for the city as an asset for the community, but instead it may serve as yet another example of top-down infrastructure planning.”

Another environmental group, Riverkeeper, slammed the Port Authority’s plan, saying the traffic and alternatives analyses had not been vetted by experts and community members and that the timeline of just one year for the environmental review was inadequate. Riverkeeper noted that the JFK AirTrain environmental review spanned three years.

“The Port Authority seems focused more on the date for the ribbon cutting than on earning community support and conducting a meaningful environmental review,” Riverkeeper President Paul Galley said. “It’s time for a real public discussion about the very serious issues that surround the Port Authority’s AirTrain plan.”

Reach reporter Bill Parry by e-mail at bparry@cnglocal.com or by phone at (718) 260–4538.

Updated 2:17 pm, October 15, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
The pie in the sky to nowhere, part of Cuomo's aspirations to run for president in 2020.
Oct. 19, 5:06 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not TimesLedger.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to TimesLedger.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

Classifieds

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: