5Pointz artists awarded $6.7 million for destroyed graffiti as developer vows appeal

TimesLedger Newspapers
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A federal judge in Brooklyn ruled in favor of the 5Pointz artists Monday, ordering developer Jerry Wolkoff to pay $6.7 million in compensation for ordering the whitewashing of the world famous graffiti mecca in November 2013.

In his 100-page decision, Judge Frederick Block awarded the maximum of $150,000 for each of the 45 murals that were destroyed in the dark of night without warning at the Long Island City warehouse complex, which was torn down a year later to make way for two residential towers.

The ruling followed a three-week trial at Federal District Court in November with the jury finding Wolkoff had violated the federal Visual Artists Rights Act — which was enacted in 1990 and grants artists the rights to prevent intentional modification of their visual artworks and the destruction or mutilation of artworks “of a recognized stature.” It is the first time VARA has been used to protect aerosol artwork.

“5Pointz was its temple, though it can never be replaced, this judgement is a monumental step for our culture and our art form,” 5Pointz Curator Jonathan “Meres” Cohen told artnet News following the ruling. “Judge Block’s decision will change the art form perception for generations to come.”

In his decision, Judge Block wrote, “If not for Wolkoff’s insolence, these damages would not have been assessed. If he did not destroy 5Pointz until he received his permits and demolished it 10 months later, the Court would not have found that he had acted willfully.”

Wolkoff was stunned by the judge’s ruling.

“What permits?” he asked. “Have you ever had to deal with the City of New York? I could have waited years for those permits. It’s an insane decision and I’m going to go through the appeal process. Why would he think any differently if it was two days or six months? I’ll appeal it and we’ll go from there.”

Reach reporter Bill Parry by e-mail at or by phone at (718) 260–4538.

Posted 11:59 am, February 13, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

crime does pay from Queens says:
Vagrants deface a building but get rewarded. Disgusting.

Bad lesson for children.
Feb. 13, 2018, 4:59 pm
kail from outoftheborough says:
The ruling offends a basic sense of fairness. Your own property, donated space, temporarily given for free, then you have to go to court to be able to use your property as you choose? And a court rules you have to pay the people you hosted for free for years because it's insolent to paint over their art they painted on your property when they knew from the start it was your property?
Feb. 14, 2018, 8:37 am
daniela from astoria says:
I do not see this as art I see it as graffiti destroying our buildings. The nerve of this ruling. As a homeowner who had to deal with graffiti on my building I am appalled at the judges decision. If he likes it that much he should have all this graffiti on his house.
Feb. 14, 2018, 11:40 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.


Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: